116 DREAMCHASERS Micah Richards

116 DREAMCHASERS Micah Richards

116 DREAMCHASERS Micah Richards
Position: RB
Alt Position: RB
Height: 180 CM
Stamina:
Skill Moves:
Weak Foot:
Stats
Base Stats
Max Stats
134 Pace
104 Shooting
102 Passing
121 Dribbling
136 Defending
142 Physical
165 Pace
114 Shooting
128 Passing
148 Dribbling
195 Defending
173 Physical
Work Rate: Medium/High
Traits:
Long Throw
Long Throw
Dives Into Tackle
Dives Into Tackle
Skill Points [Recommended]:
2x Centre Back 2x Stopper 1x Physical
Detail Review
Pace
+
His pace is very good. It’s one of the best things about this card. He can cover both sides of the pitch easily and is perfect for a fullback role. He can also work as a cover centre back when needed.
(9.5/10)
Passing
+
His passing is good. He can provide multiple passes and help in build-up play. For a centre back/fullback, his passing is above expectations.
((8.9/10))
Stamina
+
His stamina is very good. He can last around 70–80 minutes, which is a big advantage. It makes him reliable throughout most of the match.
((9.0/10))
Defending
-
As a centre back, his defending is not that good. His tackling is weak and he can lose the ball while defending. This is a major downside.
(7.9/10)
Physical
-
His physicality is poor. He gets pushed off the ball very easily, even with slight contact from attackers or midfielders. This affects both his defending and attacking involvement.
(7.0/10)
awareness
-
His awareness is not good. He struggles with marking and positioning against attackers. Sometimes he just chases players instead of defending properly.
((7.0/10))
Positioning
-
His positioning is also not reliable. Because of his low awareness, he often gets out of position and fails to mark attackers properly.
((7.9/10))
Overall Rating: 8.2/10
Final Verdict

This card is not good as a centre back, but works well as a fullback. We tested him in both roles, and he performs much better at fullback. His pace and stamina are strong points, making him suitable for wide positions. However, his defending, physical, awareness, and positioning are not good enough for a centre back. If you want to use him as a fullback, he is a decent option. But as a centre back, I would not recommend him.

Practical Test
5-5.9
POOR
6-6.9
AVERAGE
7-7.9
GOOD
8-8.9
GREAT
9-10
EXCELLENT
Alternatives
Meta Alternative 1
Meta Alternative 1
Meta Alternative 2
Meta Alternative 2
Cheap Alternative
Cheap Alternative
Disclaimer

Disclaimer: All ratings are given relative to the CM benchmark and may vary depending on playstyle.